Philippine Standard Time
Monday, June 10, 2019, 2:18:54AM

In Defense of the Right to Life: International Law and Death Penalty in the Philippines

A study by the Commission on Human Rights of the Philippines and Dr. Christopher Ward, SC, Australian Bar, Adjunct Professor, Australian National University


Zimbabwe Considers Abolishing Death Penalty
Human Rights Watch |, February 15, 2024
Death penalty incompatible with right to life
OHCHR |, January 31, 2024
Debunking narratives for a return of the death penalty
WCADP |, November 13, 2023
Jury in Pittsburgh synagogue trial to begin deliberating death penalty
The New York Times |, July 31, 2023
Singapore executes a woman for first time in almost two decades
The Guardian |, July 28, 2023
Ghana votes to remove death penalty, calling it sign of ‘inhumane’ society
The Washington Post |, July 26, 2023
Comment by UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk after Ghana’s Parliament votes to abolish death penalty
UN OHCHR |, July 26, 2023
Parents in South Korea who kill newborns now face death penalty after law passed
The Straits Times |, July 19, 2023
Capitol Hill Democrats introduce bill to end federal death penalty
Catholic News Agency |, July 19, 2023
North Koreans risk death penalty for using South Korean language
Scottish Legal News |, June 30, 2023
Arizona Man Is Freed After 28 Years on Death Row
New York Times |, June 16, 2023
Two Australians facing death penalty in Vietnam granted clemency
Al Jazeera |, June 06, 2023
Japanese Supreme Court upholds mans death sentence for Manila murders
The Japan Times |, June 05, 2023
Zimbabwe’s new bill that imposes death penalty for ‘unpatriotic acts’
Africa Feeds |, June 01, 2023
Iran hangs three on drug charges amid criticism
Al Jazeera |, May 21, 2023
Singapore: OHCHR calls on authorities to halt imminent trafficking execution
United Nation News |, April 25, 2023
Washington state eliminates death penalty from law
CNN |, April 21, 2023
Malaysia ends mandatory death penalty for serious crimes
BBC News |, April 03, 2023
HC: Death penalty should be abolished in the 21st century
UN OHCHR |, April 03, 2023
HC: Death penalty should be abolished in the 21st century
UN OHCHR |, April 03, 2023
HC: Death penalty should be abolished in the 21st century
UN OHCHR |, April 03, 2023
HC: Death penalty should be abolished in the 21st century
UN OHCHR |, April 03, 2023
Surge in executions of drug offenders in 2022, more on death row
Al Jazeera |, March 16, 2023
Pope condemns Irans use of death penalty against protesters
Reuters |, January 09, 2023
Pope Francis’ prayer intention for September: ‘Abolition of the death penalty’
CBCP News |, September 01, 2022
Singapore executes two drug traffickers despite pleas for clemency
CNN |, July 07, 2022
Malaysia to abolish mandatory death penalty
Al Jazeera |, June 10, 2022
Missionary priest praises Central African Republic for abolishing death penalty
Crux |, June 02, 2022
Saudi Arabia: Release Abdullah al-Howaiti, revoke death sentence
Un News |, May 31, 2022
Rights office welcomes Zambia’s pledge to abolish the death penalty
UN News |, May 22, 2022
Kazakhstan Finalizes Commitment to Abolishing Death Penalty, Submits Ratification of Protocol to UN
The Astana Times |, March 28, 2022
Papua New Guinea abolishes death penalty
JURIST |, January 24, 2022
‘Just Mercy’ author urges Utah Legislature to abolish death penalty
Deseret News |, January 20, 2022
Macron calls for worldwide end to death penalty on 40th anniversary of French abolition
France 24 |, September 10, 2021
Virginia Becomes First Southern State to Abolish the Death Penalty
The New York Times |, March 24, 2021
Death penalty debate reemerges in Nevada after past stalls
Fox 5 (Las Vegas) |, March 24, 2021
Virginia becomes first state in US south to abolish death penalty
ALJAZEERA |, March 24, 2021
Abolish the federal death penalty
Chicago Sun-times |, March 01, 2021
Family members of murder victims speak out against the death penalty
KPVI News 6 |, March 01, 2021
Bill To Repeal Death Penalty Filed In Wyoming Legislature
Kgab |, March 01, 2021
State Senate Votes to Abolish Death Penalty
Newsradio 1140 WRVA |, February 04, 2021
Trump administration carries out 13th, final federal execution
Aljazeera |, January 16, 2021
A federal judge has granted a stay of execution for the only woman on federal death row pending a competency hearing
CNN |, January 12, 2021
Asian Nations Reject UN Vote Against Death Penalty
Human Rights Watch |, November 24, 2020
Holy See: ‘Death penalty the most shocking thing in the world
Vatican News |, October 10, 2020
Tunisia president calls for return of death penalty following brutal killing
The Guardian |, October 01, 2020
Kazakhstan takes important step towards abolishing death penalty
Amnesty Internatonal |, September 24, 2020
US Bishops stress opposition to death penalty
Independent Catholic News |, September 23, 2020
‘Travesty of justice’: Reaction to execution of Iranian wrestler
Aljazeera |, September 14, 2020
Unpacking public opinion on the death penalty
Asia Pacific Forum |, July 28, 2020
The Florida Supreme Court’s U-turn on the death penalty
Tampa Bay Times |, May 28, 2020
Man sentenced to death in Singapore via Zoom
BBC News |, May 20, 2020
Saudi Arabia ends death penalty for crimes committed by minors
The Guardian |, April 27, 2020
Catholic leaders praise abolition of death penalty in Colorado
CRUX |, March 25, 2020
Colorado Abolishes Death Penalty and Commutes Sentences of Death Row Inmates
The New York Times |, March 23, 2020
UK urged to act over men facing death in Egypt for alleged childhood crimes
The Guardian |, March 08, 2020
Berlin International Film Festival: Iranian film about executions wins top prize
BBC |, February 29, 2020
Trump condemned after claiming very powerful death penalty would reduce drug dealing
The Independent |, February 11, 2020
Outsourcing injustice: Guantanamo on the Euphrates
Al Jazeera News |, February 04, 2020
British Isis prisoners may end up in Iraq, where death sentences are handed down without due process
Independent |, February 02, 2020
Saudi Arabia executed record number of prisoners in 2019: Report
ABC News |, January 14, 2020
Death Sentence Overturned for Pervez Musharraf, Ex-Leader of Pakistan
The New York Times |, January 13, 2020
Japan executes foreigner for first time in a decade
Independent |, December 26, 2019
The Khashoggi verdict is exactly what impunity looks like. It must be denounced.
Agnes Callamard, Opinions, Washington Post |, December 24, 2019
5 foreigners in drug case could face death in Indonesia |, December 18, 2019
Pervez Musharraf: Pakistan ex-leader sentenced to death for treason
BBC News |, December 17, 2019
Botswana urged to abolish death penalty after latest execution
The Guardian |, December 09, 2019
I Oversaw Executions. We Cannot Resume the Federal Death Penalty
New York Times |, December 04, 2019
Americans Now Support Life in Prison Over Death Penalty
Gallup News |, November 25, 2019
UN criticizes Irans use of death penalty against minors
DW |, October 24, 2019
The Death Penalty for Drugs: What Public Opinion Surveys in Asia Teach Us
Giada Girelli, Filter Mag |, October 17, 2019
Malaysia: Unfair trials, secretive hangings and petty drug convictions reveal ‘cruel injustice’ of the death penalty
Amnesty International |, October 10, 2019
Against the death penalty: barrister Julian McMahon
ABC Radio |, July 25, 2019
Malaysia’s repeal of death penalty opens deep wounds, including that of Mongolian model murder
The Independent|, July 09, 2019
Why is Sri Lanka reinstating death penalty?
DW|, July 07, 2019
Debate on death penalty not very vigorous 1 year after Aum executions
Japan Today|, July 06, 2019
Prosecutor won’t seek death penalty in death of grandmother
News 4 Tucson|, July 06, 2019
SC issues Interim Order against death penalty
Daily FT|, July 06, 2019
Latter-day Saint Church defends involvement in death penalty case
Fox13 Salt Lake City|, July 06, 2019
Sri Lanka- Supreme Court issues interim order against death penalty
MenaFN|, July 05, 2019
Jury to consider death penalty in Chinese scholar killing
Federal News Network|, July 05, 2019
Death penalty debate remains muted in Japan 1 year after AUM executions
Kyodo News|, July 05, 2019
Source: Govt will not table Bill to abolish death penalty this Parliament meeting
The Star|, July 05, 2019
The murder was caught on surveillance video. The accused now faces death if convicted
Miami Herald|, July 05, 2019
As Malaysia eyes death penalty repeal, Al Jazeera documentary explores dilemma of capital punishment
Malay Mail|, July 04, 2019
Kentucky judge declares death penalty protocol unconstitutional
Crux Now|, July 04, 2019
Merced County DA is seeking the death penalty. And it could get costly, experts say
The Merced Sunstar|, July 03, 2019
Jose Martinez, The Hit Man Who Confessed To Killing Three Dozen People, Avoids The Death Penalty
BuzzFeed News|, July 03, 2019
Kentucky judge declares states death penalty protocol unconstitutional
The Courier Journal|, July 02, 2019
Activists Hold Annual Fast Outside Supreme Court to Protest Death Penalty
Spektrum News|, July 02, 2019
Lawmakers vote to substantially limit Oregon’s death penalty
Oregon Live|, June 29, 2019
Abolish the Death Penalty?
New York Times|, June 22, 2019
In Los Angeles, only people of color are sentenced to death
The Guardian|, June 18, 2019
The Intercept|, June 18, 2019
Debunking the Court’s Latest Death-Penalty Obsession
The Atlantic|, June 17, 2019
Poll finds Californians support the death penalty — and Newsom’s moratorium on executions
The LA Times|, June 17, 2019
Using Saudi death penalty vs. children is barbaric
CNN|, June 17, 2019
Reader reluctantly accepts governor’s death penalty moratorium
The LA Times|, June 14, 2019
Saudi Teenager Faces Death Sentence for Acts When He Was 10
New York Times|, June 09, 2019
GOP Lawmakers Are Quietly Turning Against the Death Penalty
The Atlantic|, June 07, 2019
Death knell: taking a stand to abolish capital punishment
Monash University |, February 26, 2019
Germany abolishes death penalty in public vote
Independent |, November 21, 2018
Pope Francis: ‘death penalty inadmissable’
Vatican News |, August 02, 2018
One Test Could Exonerate Him. Why Wont California Do It?
The New York Times|, May 17, 2018

World News


June 18, 2019, The Intercept

ON THE NIGHT of June 20, the United States will mark a grim milestone: the 1,500th execution since the return of the death penalty in 1976. Forty-two-year-old Marion Wilson Jr. is scheduled to die by lethal injection on Thursday at the Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison in Jackson. A clemency hearing will take place in Atlanta beforehand, but the execution will almost certainly proceed. The Georgia Department of Corrections announced Wilson’s last meal last week: thin-crust pizza, chicken wings, and ice cream.

If there’s nothing inherently significant about the number 1,500, it is at least a moment for reflection. The 1,000th execution in the U.S. took placeamid candlelight vigils in North Carolina in 2005. Cameron Todd Willingham had been executed in Texas the previous year, for a crime many now recognize he did not commit. Then-President George W. Bush — who himself oversaw 152 executions in Texas — took the occasion to laud the death penalty, with no sense of irony, as saving “innocent lives.” Yet there were also signs of the death penalty’s decline. Earlier that year, the U.S. Supreme Court had outlawed death sentences for juvenile defendants, a historic ban already in place throughout most of the world.

Today, the shifting landscape around the death penalty remains filled with such contradictions. The White House is occupied by a man who fantasizes about executing drug dealers, yet executions and new death sentences are on a steep downward trend. Sixty executions were carried out across the country in 2005. Last year, there were 25. North Carolina has not carried out an execution since 2006, with a recent reportcalling its death penalty system a “relic of another era.” In the meantime, nine states have ended the death penalty by legislation or court order, while another four have put a moratorium in place.

Yet executions persist. In some states, they are surging. Last year, the electric chair returned to Tennessee, a state that had seen no executions for the better part of a decade, only to kill four men in just over nine months. Now it is confronting doubts over the guilt of a man it killed years ago. Faced with a crisis over lethal injection, the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly refused to rein in the machinery of death, upholding execution methods that experts describe as torture. The death penalty may be dying, but it will not go quickly or quietly.

It is perhaps fitting that the 1,500th execution should take place in the state that ushered in what we commonly call the “modern death penalty era.” It was a Georgia case — Furman v. Georgia — that led the U.S. Supreme Court to stop executions in 1972, on the basis that it was arbitrary and capriciously applied. Four years later, Gregg v. Georgia upheld a revised death penalty law that would become a model for other states — a new chapter in capital punishment. Executions resumed the next year.

But promise of Gregg was never fulfilled. Instead, the four-year gap between Furman and Gregg created a false distinction between the death penalty then and now; one that would sever executions from their rootsin racial violence — especially in the South — while giving cover to a system that remained largely unchanged: racist, biased against the poor, and condemning the most vulnerable rather than the “worst of the worst.”

Georgia has consistently exposed the ugliest truths about who we condemn to die.

With some 50 people on death row — and having carried out 73 executions since Gregg — Georgia is neither the largest nor the most active death penalty state in the country. But it has consistently exposed the ugliest truths about who we condemn to die. Almost eight years ago, the state killed Troy Davisamid widespread outcry. In 2015 alone, Georgia killed a Vietnam veteran with severe PTSD, a man diagnosed with an IQ of 70, a woman who became a theologian and mentor to scores of incarcerated women, and a man who credibly insisteduntil his last breath that he was innocent. The next year, Georgia killed Kenneth Fults despite a juror’s openly racist views. Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to take a case involving another racist juror, who wondered “if black people even have souls.”

Against this backdrop, the case of Marion Wilson is notable in one important way. Unlike most who face execution in the U.S., he was sentenced to die for killing a black person. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, of the 1,499 executions carried out to date, 1,170 involved white victims. In Georgia, this dynamic was especially stark at the time Wilson was tried. By the time he arrived on death row in 1997, 22 people had been executed in Georgia’s death chamber. All but two victims in those cases were white.

“What we can clearly see here with Georgia is that black lives continue to not matter, except maybe when they are blue,” says Abe Bonowitz, director of Death Penalty Action, which is coordinating demonstrations against the 1,500th execution. Had the victim in his case not been a law enforcement officer, “would the prosecutors have sought the death penalty? The statistics say no.”

In other ways, Wilson’s case is all too typical. Like so many who end up on death row, he was represented by lawyers who had no experience with capital cases. One later went to prison himself. This was an era, as veteran death penalty attorney Stephen Bright wrote in 1994, in which death sentences were imposed “not for the worst crime, but for the worst lawyer.” It was not until 2005 that the state opened the office of the Georgia Capital Defender to provide attorneys qualified to handle capital cases. Speaking to me about another Georgia execution, in 2016, Bright called cases like these “zombie cases,” convictions that reveal the unfairness of Georgia’s old death penalty system.

This phenomenon goes well beyond Georgia. If the 1,500th execution can tell us anything about capital punishment in the modern death penalty era, it’s how stuck in the past it actually is.

Death row at the Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison in Jackson, Ga., on Dec. 1, 2015.

Photo: David Goldman/AP

As Predicable as a Lightning Strike

There is no denying that the murder that sent Wilson to death row was senseless and cruel.

It was the night of March 28, 1996. Donovan Corey Parks had left the home he shared with his father and brother in Milledgeville, Georgia, to buy cat food. The 24-year-old worked full-time as a prison guard, but that day, he’d done a shift at the Winn-Dixie where he worked to make ends meet. As he exited the local Walmart, Parks was approached by 19-year-old Wilson and 18-year-old Robert Earl Butts Jr. Witnesses said Butts asked if Parks could give them a lift. “And the victim, being the nice guy he was, said, “Sure, I’ll give you a ride,” then-District Attorney Fred Bright told jurors in 1997. The pair had a sawed-off shotgun. Soon after that, Parks was dead from a blast to the head.

By an awful twist of fate, Parks was discovered by his own father, Freddie Parks, who was driving to see a friend when he saw a body lying face down on the road in a pool of blood. He ran to the nearest house to call 911, waiting for police to arrive. “But I didn’t have no idea that was my own son,” Parks would later testify. It was only after he left that he realized that the suit the dead man was wearing looked like the one his son had worn to church that night.

“The state cannot prove who pulled the trigger in this case. I’ll tell you that point-blank.”

The murder enraged residents of Baldwin County, a community closely identified with the Georgia Department of Corrections. The elder Parks, who worked with the GDC himself, had just lost his wife the year before. It was his son Donovan who often took care of things around the house, including the cat his wife had left behind. As Wilson’s trial got underway in the fall of 1997, a large portion of the prospective jury pool were employed by — or related to employees of — nearby prisons or jails.

Wilson insisted from the start that he had not set out to kill anyone that day. In a taped interrogation, he repeatedly told police that Butts had shot Parks. There was reason to believe that Wilson was the least culpable of the two; prosecutors initially offered Wilson a plea deal, but he refused, insisting that he should not be held responsible for someone else’s actions. At trial, Bright conceded that he did not have evidence that Wilson was the gunman. “The state cannot prove who pulled the trigger in this case. I’ll tell you that point-blank,” he said, adding, “It could have been either one.” Nevertheless, the jury convicted Wilson and sent him to die.

But at Butts’ trial the next year, Bright changed the story. He cast Butts as the triggerman, based on the statements of jailhouse informants who claimed that Butts had admitted his guilt. Such testimony is highly unreliable, a common factor in wrongful convictions, but it was more than he had against Wilson — and good enough for a death sentence. In 1998, Butts, too, was sentenced to die.

Join Our Newsletter

Original reporting. Fearless journalism. Delivered to you.

I’m in

Wilson had been on death row for 10 years when the Atlanta Journal-Constitution published a front-page special report in its Sunday edition. “Death Still Arbitrary” was the 2007 headline, part of a series investigating the state’s death penalty system. It found that of the 132 “most heinous” murders in the state over a recent 10-year span, only 29 had ended in death sentences. There was nothing clear to set these apart from the remaining 103. Decades after Furman, the report concluded, paraphrasing one of the iconic quotes from the decision, “getting the death penalty in Georgia is as predictable as a lightning strike.”

The findings of the AJC investigation would be familiar to anyone who studies the death penalty today. As in other states, death sentences came down to the county in which the crime was committed and the DA in charge at the time. Prosecutors did not exactly dispute this point; the newspaper quoted one DA who simply said about a death penalty case, “You know it when you see it.”

To illustrate the arbitrariness of Georgia’s death penalty statute in practice, the AJC chose the convictions of Wilson and Butts. Their crime had striking similarities to a 1995 murder in a nearby county — one in which two young men killed a college student from Gambia. In both cases, the co-defendants had asked for a ride, then shot the victim and burned the car. In both cases, who exactly fire the fatal shot remained unclear. Yet Wilson and Butts were sentenced to die, whereas the other men received life without parole.

In theory, there was supposed to be a safeguard against such disparate outcomes: a process called comparative proportionality review. When Georgia revised its death penalty statute following Furman, it included the requirement that the Georgia Supreme Court regularly assess capital cases to ensure that sentences were not “excessive or disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases, considering both the crime and the defendant.” But, according to a sweeping study by the American Bar Association, this stopped happening in 1994 — before Wilson was even tried. Rather than consider all murder cases that could have resulted in a death sentence, the court merely began finding examples of similar crimes that sent other defendants to death row. The review became a toothless exercise, “incapable of uncovering potentially serious disparities — whether those disparities are geographical, racial or ethnic, or attributable to any other inappropriate factor,” the ABA found.

In 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari to a black man who challenged his death sentence based in part on Georgia’s failure to conduct proportionality review. Justice John Paul Stevens expressed alarmabout the case, noting that the Supreme Court’s historic decision in Gregg was based “on an understanding that the new procedures the statute prescribed would protect against the imposition of death sentences influenced by impermissible factors such as race.” But in this case, the state Supreme Court had barely glanced at similarly situated defendants before rubber-stamping the death sentence. In fact, Stevens wrote, “It now appears to be the court’s practice never to consider cases in which the jury sentenced the defendant to life imprisonment.” Such a “truncated review,” he wrote, is likely to lead to “the arbitrary or discriminatory imposition of death sentences in contravention of the Eighth Amendment.”

The situation is not unique to Georgia. In Tennessee, whose death penalty law also requires proportionality review, the state Supreme Court has “eviscerated” the process, according to a major death penalty study published last year. The state’s own post-Furman statute was modeled on Georgia’s, to ensure that death penalty cases were “distinguishable in a meaningful way from non-capital first degree murder cases.” Instead, the authors found, the state’s death penalty is “a cruel lottery, entrenching the very problems that the court sought to eradicate.”

A Background of Trauma and Abuse

On June 12, Wilson’s lawyers submitted a clemency petition to the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles. It shed light on his childhood, one that resembles the background of so many who end up on death row. “Marion Wilson’s life from conception to incarceration was characterized by instability, neglect, abuse and trauma,” they write. As with many cases, this history was only uncovered after Wilson was sent to death row.

Evidence of Wilson’s early suffering was previously described in his state habeas filings. Raised by a single mother who was herself a victim of abuse, their home lacked heat, water, and food. At one point, Wilson’s mother took him to live with her father in Oklahoma, but the grandfather, who was white, rejected him because he was black. Like other male figures who came in and out of Wilson’s life, the man beat him constantly.

At an evidentiary hearing years ago, a slew of witnesses described Wilson as a vulnerable child abandoned first by his parents and then by the state. “I remember telling one of the other teachers that Marion didn’t stand a chance growing up in such circumstances,” one of his former elementary school teachers testified. An attorney who represented Wilson in juvenile court remembered him as “someone who needed and actually wanted someone to look up to” but had “essentially no parents and no home.” An expert on the state’s juvenile justice system testified that Wilson’s case contained “every risk factor I can think of.”

At an evidentiary hearing, a slew of witnesses described Wilson as a vulnerable child abandoned first by his parents and then by the state.

Yet numerous witnesses also descried how Wilson showed potential, especially when placed in a structured environment. He thrived for a time under the supervision of the Georgia Youth Development Center, gaining early release. The law required that he be subsequently supervised by the Department of Juvenile Justice, but his case fell through the cracks.

In a failing that was emblematic of the era, Wilson’s trial attorneys did not investigate this evidence, presenting a limited picture during the penalty phase. Although they elicited testimony of a time that a young Wilson saw his mother’s common-law husband put a gun to her head, they left largely unchallenged the prosecution’s contention that Wilson had “more than every chance in life.” The clemency petition quotes one juror who has said she would likely not have voted for the death penalty if she had known more about his background.

Fred Bright, the district attorney, testified years later that he personally believed Butts probably shot Parks. But he defended his actions at Wilson’s trial. He did not live to see Georgia carry out either of the death sentences, however. Bright died in May of last year, just one week before Butts was killed by lethal injection. But Freddie Parks was there as a witness. Now in his 70s, he plans to attend Wilson’s execution as well.

“It’s not easy,” Parks told me on the phone last week. “It’s not easy to wait 23 years.” It was by the grace of God that he lived this long, he said. But he does not expect Wilson’s death to bring him any closure over his son’s murder. After leaving the prison last time, Parks said, “I felt just like I’m feeling now. Just aggravated, really. Like it never should have happened.”

World News index: